May 24 2008

ben

Well Oil be damned…

I remember being warned by concerned schoolteachers back in the 70’s that the world I would inhabit as an adult would be one devoid of oil. New fuel sources would have to be found if modernity were to survive. Well here we are almost 40 years later and production and consumption of oil has risen since then, not fallen. How come? Well the harbingers of doom would have us believe that we really, really are in difficult times and that this really, really is the last days of oil as a fuel source. A theory developed known as ‘Peak Oil’ shows just how low the oil barrel is and we’re already scraping the bottom of it. A theory some of you will not be surprised to know I disagree with vehemently.

Whenever theories like this are developed they take into account ‘known sources’ and ‘known reserves’ - and a cursory examination of the entire field would show that we can have, should have, and those in the know DO HAVE, every reason to believe there is just as much oil lying in hidden reserves hitherto unexplored than have been consumed thus far in the history of oil consumption. Sure it’s harder to extract, which is why few exploration licences have been sought or issued but as the price per barrel continues to rise then these unexplored areas become far more viable economically to explore. Add to this the fact that some wells closed prematurely when the price slumped (rendering them unviable economically) but as the price rises, these wells once more become viable. Even allowing for this though, there’s one theory out there, which if true, would turn our understanding of oil supplies upside down and change the political landscape of the world (as well as raise huge questions of just what’s been going on for the last fifty years or so) - that theory, offered by no less a prestigious scientist as the late Thomas Gold (winner of the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society 1985) suggests that Oil is a self replenishing source and that our current beliefs as to how it forms are quite simply nonsense.

Using current scientific belief it takes millions of years for oil to develop through processes and forces involving pressure and fossilised remains of once living organisms. Gold asks ‘How can this be?’ He highlighted the fact that many known oil fields once depleted and abandoned, have ‘filled up again?’

Renewable?

This is not a one off phenomena - it has happened in Russia, Mexico, the USA and the Middle East. Oil fields have been completely worked out and closed up. When investigated seven or so years later they have returned to containing as much oil as was there in the initial days of drilling. He argues for an abiogenic understanding of how oil forms - or to put it another way in relation to the hydracorbons necessary in the making of oil - “Hydrocarbons are not biology reworked by geology (as the traditional view would hold) but rather geology reworked by biology.”

‘In his 1999 book, “The Deep Hot Biosphere,” He presents compelling evidence for inorganic oil formation. He notes that geologic structures where oil is found all correspond to “deep earth” formations, not the haphazard depositions we find with sedimentary rock, associated fossils or even current surface life.

He also notes that oil extracted from varying depths from the same oil field have the same chemistry – oil chemistry does not vary as fossils vary with increasing depth. Also interesting is the fact that oil is found in huge quantities among geographic formations where assays of prehistoric life are not sufficient to produce the existing reservoirs of oil. Where then did it come from?

Dr. Gold strongly believes that oil is a “renewable, primordial soup continually manufactured by the Earth under ultrahot conditions and tremendous pressures. As this substance migrates toward the surface, it is attached by bacteria, making it appear to have an organic origin dating back to the dinosaurs.” See WorldNetDaily

In an effort to show that oil can be found anywhere ‘one chooses to dig deep enough’, Gold and a team of drillers chose somewhere no oil should be, no oils should ever form as there is neither the geology or fossilised remains to allow it to happen. He chose a granite mountain in Sweden and sure enough after boring a hole seven miles deep - they struck oil.

Something ‘out there’ isn’t right.

No responses yet

May 17 2008

ben

200 million year old human fossil

Filed under Fortean, Mystery, Ooparts

Further evidence strengthening the position I adopted in the previous post has been brought to my attention - namely a fossilised human handprint found in America - the problem with this one is that the fossilised hand is in Limestone which is dated at 110 million years old…

I’d also like to thank a friend for pointing me in the direction of a human foot fossil (which admittedly are reasonably common) except this one is in rock which is over 200 million years old (long before humans had evolved) - oh and for such primitive creatures the truly remarkable thing about this one is - it was wearing shoes.

Ben

One response so far

May 17 2008

ben

Oops - Ooparts - (There’s something wrong with our history)

Most things in life I approach seriously and professionaly, my music, my writing, my sociological studies to name but a few. However regular readers may be forgiven for thinking that I’ve taken leave of my senses on this one - Ooparts (of which I’ll explain more in a moment).

I’ve long suspected that our knowledge of prehistory is patchy to say the least, nonsensical to say the most.

crystal skull

As someone trained in Sociological analysis/Applied social science I can’t tell you what the truth is, but I know a lie when I see one.

Something is wrong with what we are led to believe constitutes our prehistory. It’s a lie.

I have no idea who’s purposes this lie supports, no idea who’s hidden hand is guiding and shaping the ‘truth’ as it is presented to us today…but let’s look at the facts shall we?

Modern humans, we are told, originated 200,000 years ago in Africa - so far so good, and so believable. This ‘knowledge’ feeds into so many of the big questions, big issues which confront people who care to spend the time pondering on them. Where did we come from? Why are we here? It impacts on religious belief, on our understanding of our place in the universe, in some ways it helps to make sense of the world around us today and better function within it. But…

Ooparts - Out of place artifacts to be precise. Archaeologists will tell you that such things exist, but that they are overlooked. Why are they overlooked? Because to acknowledge they truly represent what they appear to represent - would be to throw just about every belief we have about the past away and start again. Remember how we’re supposed to be 200,000 years old? Then explain this -

Kingoodie Hammer

It’s quite clearly a hammer - and the vast majority of archaeologists would agree it’s a hammer (It’s called the Kingoodie hammer to be precise after the location in Scotland at which it was found). Now unless Dinosaurs or very early microbes had this incredible ability to fashion tools, this presents archaeology and consequently us, with a major and fundamental problem. The hammer couldn’t have burrowed it’s way into the sandstone - the sandstone had to form around the hammer - so? Well the sandstone is acknowledged by geologists to be old red sandstone which is between 360 MILLION to 408 MILLION years old!!! It doesn’t take a genius to fathom that it changes EVERYTHING. It’s something archaeology doesn’t shout loud about, a dirty little secret if you will, just waiting to unravel thousands of respectable careers. Of course the rational reader might say ‘But it’s one artifact and surely rather than discredit all our knowledge thus far it’s more likey there’s a process involved in it’s creation which we don’t understand?’ - A view I would sympathise with if it were not for the almost hundreds of other Ooparts which exist.

The late, great scientist and science fiction writer Arthur C Clarke, when asked what the greatest mystery he had encountered was, said “The oddest thing is these vitrified forts in Scotland. I just thought, how the hell? After all, lasers were not common in the Stone Age.” Yes - lasers in the Stone Age - there are over 50 vitrified forts in Scotland (80% of the known vitrified forts in existence) others can be found in Italy, France, Spain and one in Iraq and a few scattered elsewhere. But what is clear is that to entirely vitrify a fort the heat necessary, is akin to that achieved in an atomic explosion. So what’s going on there? Stone age man with atomic weapons?

The internet has given the ordinary man and woman access to information about our past which hitherto may only have been the domain of specialists, academics, eccentrics even…I could go on about Ooparts forever, there are so many of them, but just offering you the reader the name to go Google with - Ooparts, should I hope - provide you with endless unearthing of mysteries.

I unashamedly recommend anyone wanting to join a discussion of the subject to pay a visit to Planet Flipside

The truth is out there…

No responses yet